First-time homebuyers: How to get the $8,000 tax credit

This has been a hot topic, so we thought that this article may help answer a lot of common questions:

First-time homebuyers: How to get the $8,000 tax credit

WASHINGTON – Feb. 17, 2009 – How does a first-time homebuyer take advantage of the $8,000 tax credit that President Obama is expected to sign into law tomorrow? It comes with a few rules. According to the most recent analysis, the following rules will apply – though things could change as tax professionals weigh the details:

• The deduction is worth 10 percent of a home’s value up to $8,000, which means all homes worth more than $80,000 could qualify for the maximum amount.

• There is an income limit to qualify. A married couples’ modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) should be under $150,000 and single filers’ MAGI should be less than $75,000.

• Partial tax credits may be available for married couples with MAGI incomes over $150,000 but under $170,000, and single filers with incomes over $75,000 but under $95,000.

• If married couples file separately, they can both claim 5 percent of the home purchase ($4,000 each for a home over $80,000) on their tax returns.

• It’s a tax credit, not a deduction. That means the entire amount goes back to the first-time homebuyer unlike deductions, such as mortgage interest, that are subtracted from gross income before tax is calculated. If qualified for $8,000, the buyer gets $8,000, even if they would not owe that much in taxes otherwise.

• The tax credit applies to homes purchased between Jan. 1, 2009, and Dec. 31, 2009.

• The tax credit does not have to be paid back, providing the homebuyer keeps the property for at least 36 months and resides in the home.

• To qualify as a first-time homebuyer, the purchaser cannot have owned a home within the previous three-year period. However, ownership of a vacation home or rental home does not disqualify the buyer.

• If purchasing a new home, the effective date to receive the credit is the first day the homeowner actually lives in the house. If construction began in 2008, that buyer could still qualify. And if construction begins in 2009 but the owner does not take possession until 2010, the buyer would not qualify.

• The tax credit can be claimed on 2008 income tax forms even though the purchase took place in 2009. A buyer could close on a home the same day that President Obama signs it into law, fill out their income tax forms the next day, and receive the tax credit fairly quickly.

The tax credit is not a downpayment, but it could be used toward a downpayment if first-time homebuyers plan ahead. U.S. taxpayers have money withheld from every paycheck for income taxes. If they owe more tax than the amount deducted, they pay the IRS; if they owe less, they get a tax refund.

By anticipating at least an $8,000 refund in early 2010 when they file 2009 taxes, these buyers could cut down on their tax withholding this year and save the money toward a downpayment. There is one caveat, however: Should they not buy a home in the qualifying period, they would still owe the IRS the money, and reducing their withholding amount could result in a high bill at tax time.

 

© 2009 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®

Fannie Mae rescinds 4-property limit for investors

If you turn down Pandora and listen closely, you can hear real estate investors in Chicago cheering all the way from Cincinnati.

Read the Fannie Mae official announcement — you get the sense that the nationalized group is getting with the program. This excerpt comes from the lead paragraph: “Fannie Mae is committed to providing financing opportunities for high-credit quality, bona fide investors. Experienced investors play a key role in the housing recovery.”

The use of the phrases “high-credit quality,” “bona fide” and “experienced” was a conscious one, by the way. Fannie Mae is averse to first-time investors and other foreclosure opportunists. Instead, it wants to serve individuals with a history of owning and successfully managing rental property.

To that end, Fannie Mae will now finance the purchases of one-unit homes for investors with an interest in between 5-10 properties, provided that all of the following guidelines are met:

* 25 percent down payment on the investment property;

* Minimum credit score of 720;

* No mortgage payments late within the last 12 months;

* No bankruptcies or foreclosures in the last seven years;

* Two years of tax returns showing rental income from all rental properties;

* Six months of principal, interest, taxes and insurance reserves on each of the financed properties.

And lastly, to reduce fraud, Fannie Mae will now require all real estate investors to sign a form granting lenders permission to verify supplied tax returns against the official, IRS-filed version. This document is less commonly known as a 4506-T.

But lest we think this guideline change is Fannie Mae’s olive branch to the people, let’s remember that our nation’s banks are holding record numbers of foreclosed homes on their balance sheets right now while the most likely buyers of those homes have been to-date locked out from financing.

Real estate investors want to buy REO, but Fannie Mae had made it impossible. The guideline change is meant to extend banks and lenders a lifeline first; bringing experienced investors back into the fold is just how it’s getting done.

That said, real estate investors are lovin’ it.

For the first time since September, investors can go to auction and know that (relatively) cheap financing will be available from the government. This should speed the reduction of REO inventory nationwide. In addition, with more investors eligible for financing, expect greater competition for prime foreclosed properties, helping to keep home prices from falling into the abyss.

The rollback gives a secondary benefit to investors, too — even those not buying additional property.

See, when the four-property restriction went into effect it was a surprise, 11th-hour announcement made on the Friday before Fannie Mae’s nationalization. This date, meanwhile, has come to be known as the day before the refi boom started.

So, on the following Monday, when mortgage rates instantly plunged three-quarters of a percent, homeowners with five properties or more found themselves ineligible.

They couldn’t refinance their investment homes; they couldn’t refinance their vacation homes; and they often couldn’t refinance their primary homes, either. While rates fell for nearly every borrower class, experienced real estate investors were locked out. Today, that’s no longer the case. “High-credit quality, bona fide” real estate investors are back in the game.

It’s good for them; it’s good for the banks; and it’s good for housing.

Not every bank sells loans to Fannie Mae, however, so if you think the new guidelines will impact your mortgage plans, be sure to check with your loan officer first.

Originally posted at The Mortgage Reports blog

Copyright (c) Dan Green

Bills to address flaws in condo-insurance law

MIAMI – Jan. 27, 2009 – A controversial law requiring condo owners to have property insurance has many of them up in arms, but lawmakers already are working on bills that would change the requirement this spring.

Letters from condo associations to unit owners demanding owners to show proof of insurance within 30 days or the associations will buy coverage on their behalf have prompted hundreds of complaints, lawmakers said.

The law, which took effect Jan. 1, also requires condo owners to add the association as an insured party on the policy.

Associations typically buy insurance that covers the building, while owners are responsible for buying policies to cover their units’ interior – flooring, cabinets, appliances and the like. Many owners, however, opt not to spend the money and were not required to – until now.

After the 2004 and 2005 hurricanes, many associations faced the problem of damaged or destroyed units that were not repaired because unit owners had no insurance. The associations wanted to be able to force owners to have the proper coverage. Before Jan. 1, only lenders could buy coverage for a home or condo if the owner let it lapse or canceled the policy.

The new law has owners confused and worried about the cost.

“Condo owners are coming and saying, ‘Tell me what I should buy,’” said Carol Everhart, an agent with BB&T Insurance in St. Petersburg.

Everhart, who sits on the board of Citizens Property Insurance, the state-run insurer, works with more than 200 condo associations.

‘Economic issue’

“It’s not such a bad law. But it’s an economic issue,” said Dulce Suarez-Resnick, an executive at Brown & Brown Insurance.

A condo policy for a small apartment (about 750 square feet in a modest building) can cost about $1,000 a year. A luxury condo with plenty of marble and granite and a high-end interior could cost as much as $5,000 a year, she said.

In addition, the law is flawed, agents said, because no insurer in Florida will sell coverage for an individual unit to a condo association and then have the association bill the owner.

The problem, says Donna Berger, general counsel for the association lobbying group Community Advocacy Network, is that the new law makes having the insurance mandatory rather than voluntary.

Already two bills – one by Rep. Ellen Bogdanoff of Fort Lauderdale and the other by Sen. Dennis Jones of Seminole – have been filed that will make some fixes in the “glitches” in new law.

Both bills would make the insurance coverage voluntary – not mandatory – for unit owners and would allow the associations to buy the coverage if they choose to and then bill the owners.

‘Unhappy’

Rep. Julio Robaina of Miami said his office has fielded hundreds of calls from condo owners all over the state who have gotten letters from their associations and don’t know how to proceed.

“They’re unhappy with the mandates of the new law. But [an owner] might have to buy a policy until a new law is passed,” said Robaina.

There is no penalty for not following the law, so associations could decide not to enforce it with their owners.

But agents like Suarez-Resnick and Gaby Dominguez at Avanti Insurance in west Miami-Dade County say buying insurance to cover the contents of their units as well as the interior is a good idea for condo owners to do anyway.

“The biggest mistake condo owners make is to not buy insurance because they think their units are covered by the association’s master policy,” said Suarez-Resnick.

Another aspect

One provision in the new law that isn’t controversial requires unit owners to purchase loss-assessment coverage of at least $2,000. That coverage would help pay for an additional charge levied by the association after a major storm to cover any shortfall to pay needed repairs.

Right now, most policies include coverage of $1,000 and many carriers were already increasing it voluntarily to $2,000, said Everhart.

But she said this coverage should be applied to the assessment deductible so that the additional cost does not burden unit owners.

Copyright © 2009 The Miami Herald, Beatrice E. Garcia. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

When does the tourist season actually start in Destin?

Tourist season begins in earnest in March during the first spring break. The spring breaks actually hit us in waves in March and April as most of the southern states have staggered vacation schedules. This is occurring at about the same time that our winter “snow bird” guests are packing up to go home.

Our area attracts many families during spring break, as opposed to the stereotypical spring break locales featured on late night TV. With our upscale dining, shopping and accommodations, the Emerald Coast naturally lends itself to a more adult clientele.

Tourist season here will wind down around Labor Day, making the months of September and October two of the nicest times to visit.  While we do have very serene peaceful stretches of beachfront here year round, September and October usually bring lots of sunshine and great weather, and the restaurants and beaches less crowded.

We bought a house 4 years ago and just found previous termite damage that had been covered up. What can we do?

We are sorry to hear about your problem.  However, that is not an easy question to answer. The discovery of such an item four years after the sale is problematic. There are several issues to consider:

You should have received a copy of a termite inspection report when you purchased four years ago. Did it mention any problems at that time? But please bear in mind that even the best termite inspector cannot see behind or through the walls. The inspector should have flagged any visible signs of wood rot, termite damage, as well as previous or current termite activity, if any.

You may have obtained a home inspection prior to closing.  but as in the case of the termite inspector, they cannot see behind or through the walls. Their disclaimers will typically state that the inspection is non-invasive in nature and that the inspector is only responsible for detecting that which is visually and readily observable.  

Another issue is that this previous damage may have even been covered up by a seller prior to the one who sold to you. If the property has been through several owners, your seller may not have been aware that a pre-existing problem existed.  The origin may be very difficult to determine.

If the problem is severe, you may wish to contact an attorney to see what your legal rights may be.

We are first time buyers and like everyone else, are wondering if now is a good time to buy a home?

The answer is yes, now is a great time to buy! It is unprecedented that interest rates and real estate prices are low at the same time. While property values may not rise for a while longer, interest rates may not be this low for long.  Even a slight rise in interest rates can have a pronounced effect on your monthly payment. So yes, take advantage of the fabulous opportunities that exist today. They won’t last forever.

 

 

One last thought … If you wait for the robins to sing, spring will be over.

 

New rules raise the bar for condo mortgages in Florida

Print This Article

New rules raise the bar for condo mortgages in Florida

Lending giant Fannie Mae is slapping tough new requirements on mortgages for Florida condos, moves that analysts believe will make it even more difficult to sell units in buildings already starved for residents and struggling financially.The standards, which took effect last week and apply only to Florida, include requiring that no more than 15 percent of a building’s unit owners be delinquent on association fees as a condition of funding home loans to new buyers.

Fannie Mae buys the majority of home loans from lenders, so it wields significant power in the making of mortgages. Fannie-backed loans generally offer the best rates and lowest down payments for borrowers.

The company, wracked with financial problems of its own and in conservatorship with the federal government, said it singled out Florida after a review of its mortgage loans revealed record-high default and foreclosure rates among condo owners. It also cited the excessive number of condos listed for sale, which has driven down prices.

The new rules come at a time when condo buyers already face difficulties getting mortgages. Many banks over the past two years have dramatically pulled back on condo lending, requiring down payments of up to 40 percent in new buildings. Some lenders even have blacklisted condo buildings, citing a high risk of price declines and defaults.

Fannie Mae’s timing ”couldn’t be worse,” said Jack McCabe, a South Florida real estate consultant who believes the region is mired in a housing depression. “This is effectively going to make it much more difficult to qualify.”

NEEDED TO QUALIFY

The new conditions include:

• No more than 15 percent of unit owners can be 30 days or more past due on association fees.

• For new condo buildings and condo conversions, at least 70 percent of units must have been sold or put under contract. That’s up from 49 percent previously.

• Fannie will have to review condo buildings itself to make sure they meet Fannie requirements — at the lender’s expense. Before, Fannie relied on the lenders to perform these reviews.

Charles Foschini, vice chairman of debt and equity finance for brokerage CB Richard Ellis in Miami, said Fannie was protecting investors, borrowers and taxpayers, as it should in a climate of increased risk.

Borrowers will benefit, he said, by knowing they are moving into a condo complex that is adequately funded and has plenty of reserves, allowing them to predict their monthly expenses.

”From the taxpayer’s perspective . . . the quicker we can instill sounder underwriting practices for mortgages for Fannie or anyone else the more confidence we’ll have in the market,” Foschini said.

`NAILS IN THE COFFIN’

But many condo buildings won’t meet those requirements, meaning the buildings most in need of bringing in fresh buyers will increasingly have trouble doing so.

Sharon Dodge, president of the condo association at The Venetia, a 30-year-old building next to the Venetian Causeway in Miami, said about 32 percent of unit owners were past due — more than double Fannie’s new rules.

She described the rules as ”driving the nails in the coffin,” just as the association is making headway on collecting delinquent payments and when sales were finally picking up.

”To have the major source of loans draw a line through us is terrible; it’s wrong and it shouldn’t happen,” Dodge said. “The feds can’t pull the rug out from under us.”

POTENTIAL FALLOUT

McCabe estimates as much as 25 percent of the market in the tri-county area will be shut out of Fannie-funded financing.

Peter Zalewski, whose Condo Vultures realty specializes in bulk sales of distressed condos, said his figures show that as many as 41 new buildings between the Julia Tuttle and Rickenbacker causeways, and from I-95 to Biscayne Bay, may be ineligible for Fannie Mae approval because they don’t meet the new 70 percent ownership threshold.

”It’s devastating,” Zalewski said.

Fannie is not the only source of funding for lenders who want to make condo loans. But John Bancroft, executive editor with trade publication Inside Mortgage Finance, said No. 2 mortgage guarantor Freddie Mac typically follows Fannie Mae’s lead and would likely implement Fannie’s guidelines soon.

The two companies owned or backed nearly $900 billion in new home loans in 2008, more than two-thirds of the market overall. Ginnie Mae is the major guarantor for FHA and VA loans. Few new buildings had been able to meet FHA certification requirements either, Zalewski said.

WHO BENEFITS?

Because few lenders are holding loans in their own portfolios, the Fannie vacuum could create new opportunities for cash-rich buyers who will be able to command even greater discounts, predicted Grant Stern, principal broker of Miami-based Morningside Mortgage.

”Fannie Mae declared Christmas for hedge funds who want to buy bulk in these buildings, but it’s leaving everyday investors and people who want to buy for their own personal use in the dust,” Stern said.

Stern added the restrictions further exemplified the self-fulfilling, cyclical nature of the credit crisis because Fannie’s action would bring about further price declines, more foreclosures and potentially more losses for the company.

”It starts with fear, then a reaction. Then the reaction causes that fear to occur, which then confirms the fear and causes a further negative reaction,” Stern said.


© 2009 Miami Herald Media Company. All Rights Reserved.
http://www.miamiherald.com

I have been thinking of getting my real estate license. Is now a good time?

Now is a good time to learn, but not a good time to earn. For the entire year 2008, an average of less than 2 sales occurred per each local Realtor agent, as was reported through our local MLS.  
 
So, as an average agent, you might reasonably expect average results. As to what that would equate to in actual income, those average performance results would provide you with annual earnings of something well below the 2008 poverty line. You know that old saying, “Don’t give up your day job!”

Second homes: The sweet life on a stretch of Florida’s ‘sugar sand’

  

By Larry Olmsted, Special for USA TODAY

Unlike densely populated South Florida or theme-park epicenter Orlando, the western panhandle of Florida has no big cities, and trendy nightclubs are few and far between. The region is not exactly sleepy, with plenty of golf courses and resort developments, but for many years it hasn’t drawn much attention from second-home buyers beyond nearby Louisiana, Texas and Alabama.

Not so any longer. Attracted by some of the best values in Florida (not to mention some of the state’s most acclaimed beaches), buyers from all over the USA and Canada are heading to south Walton County. A new international airport scheduled for 2010 may bring them from even farther.

The main selling point is sand, so soft and white locals call it “sugar sand.” The 26-mile stretch of coastline that constitutes the beaches of south Walton County has 14 towns or communities  including Seaside, the locale for the fictional picture-perfect town in the film The Truman Show. All 26 miles have been certified “Blue Wave Beaches,” an environmental seal of approval from the Clean Beaches Council.

The entire strip is on a narrow peninsula between the Gulf of Mexico and Choctawhatchee Bay. More than 40% of the region is owned by the state and protected from development. There are numerous state parks and preserves, as well as an extensive network of protected sand dunes. All of it is linked by more than 200 miles of bicycle paths and hiking trails. But the landscape is not all nature: The strip has about a dozen golf courses.

The 14 communities are each distinct  some gated, some not; some planned, some evolved. The best known are Sandestin, Seaside, WaterSound and WaterColor. Among them, they contain an array of restaurants, art galleries, shops and recreational facilities. Most have a mix of houses, townhouses and condos. Prices also are diverse, from just over $100,000 to several million dollars.

“Compared to south or central Florida, we have a huge variety of product with a large number of affordable homes,” says Joe Bracciale, director of real estate sales at Sandestin.

A look at three south Walton County neighborhoods

 WaterColor. This 500-acre mixed resort and residential development designed in traditional Southern style, includes a boutique hotel, spa, beach club, marina, shops and restaurants. Residents also have access to a nearby Tom Fazio golf course. Home sites range from $96,000 to $1.5 million and houses from $575,000 to $4.6 million. The master plan calls for 1,140 homes.

 Sandestin. This huge development contains 30 subcommunities on 2,400 acres with thousands of homes and condos, some in high-rises. It also has four golf courses, a tennis club, spa, marina, 7 miles of beach and coastline, a shopping center, pedestrian retail village, 20 restaurants and several hotels. Condos begin as low as $129,000, and houses run as high as $3 million to $4 million, but “the majority of our residences are in the $250,000-$600,000 range,” says Joe Bracciale, director of real estate sales.

 Town of WaterSound. A sister property to WaterColor, this development includes three neighborhoods, all designed in an architectural style inspired by Nantucket. WaterSound Beach is a gated, 256-acre beachfront community with mostly private homes. It has lots from $275,000 and houses from $865,000. WaterSound West Beach is a 62-acre coastal community surrounded by protected land with fewer than 200 home sites. Lots begin at $159,000 and houses at $699,000. WaterSound, on 1,400 acres, has the most residences planned, more than 1,200, and the most amenities, including a golf course and extensive trails. Lots start at $59,000 and houses from $459,000

I am being evicted from a rental house because the house is being foreclosed. What can we do?

Typically, the bank will offer you what is called “Cash-for-Keys”. If you agree to leave within a few weeks or so, they will actually pay you for leaving the property in good condition. The amount of the offer may vary from one lender to another, and we have seen everything from $500 to $2,000.

Different states and municipalities may have certain regulations pertaining to evictions which may (or may not) provide you with additional rights, so it may be advisable to check with a local attorney or Legal Aid office for details. But bear in mind that if the lender has to forcibly evict you, they will be much less likely to offer you any money to leave.